Posts Tagged ‘Apologetic Recommended Reading’

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J This is what I’m currently reading:

Millennials, like the rest of us, are human beings. I know that’s not a terribly surprising thing to say, and I haven’t actually heard anyone deny that fact. But with the coming of age of each new generation, it seems there’s always a flurry of books and articles competing both for the honor of naming that generation and of describing what’s unique about them. And of course, so long as we’re okay using sweeping generalizations, each generation does tend to exhibit characteristics setting it apart from those who came before and will come after. Usually that has to do with the historical and cultural context in which they came of age. So one generation was deeply affected by the post-World War II world, the next by the upheavals of the 1960s and 1970s, the next by the Cold War, and on and on.

I’ll leave it to the professionals to do the work of describing exactly what’s affected millennials and how it’s affected them. As a Christian pastor, my task is to do the even harder work of reminding people—including millennials themselves—they’re not that different from the rest of us. The world has been around for a very long time, and the deepest problems plaguing millennials today have plagued every generation throughout human history. What’s more, the greatest solution we can offer millennials is the same as it’s ever been. That doesn’t change.

Changing Culture, Unchanging Power

My church, Third Avenue Baptist Church in Louisville, Kentucky, is located right next to the campus of the University of Louisville, an enormous research institution and, of course, athletics powerhouse (Go Cards!). Because of that, I’m constantly talking with college students—the heart of the millennial generation. Those students come from a thousand spiritual and intellectual directions, too. Some are Christians, some are Muslims, others are agnostics or humanists, and a majority identify as none of the above. This new category of religious affiliation, “nones,” have never even given it a moment’s thought.

But you know what I’ve noticed about all of them, regardless of their intellectual and religious leanings? And you know what ties them together with the students from my own generation I started college with 20 years ago, and also with the generation before that, and even the generation before that? When you get to the bottom of it, they’re all sinners, and they need to be saved by the grace of God in Jesus Christ.

Here’s why that’s so important to remember: In our excitement to figure out what makes each generation unique, it can be easy to think the gospel that saved many in the last generation simply isn’t going to have the same power in this new one. But of course, the differences we can identify between generations are just the tops of the mountains. Are they important? Yes. But what’s more important are the metric tons of commonality that exist between all of us as humans: We are all made in the image of God, we have all rebelled against him and gone our own way, we all need the grace of forgiveness and a substitute to stand in our place. Death stares us in the face, and eternity stretches out before us all. So maybe the first and most important thing we can do as we minister to millennials and nones is to remember we’re ministering to human beings. And the same good news that’s saved millions through the ages will, by God’s grace, continue to do so in this generation and every one that follows.

All that said, though, my experience pastoring millennials has shown me this generation does arrive with a special set of presuppositions, ignorances, and (perhaps most importantly) attitudes that we as Christians need to know how to address. That’s not to say any of those are unique to millennials; we Gen X’ers had many of these same things, too. (It’s like I tell my 13-year-old son: You think I don’t understand you, but I do. Oh, I do!) Unique or not, this is the millennial moment, and since we’re therefore surrounded by millennials, it would do us well to be aware of what makes them tick.

Here are four pieces of advice that might help as you go about pastoring and sharing the gospel with this rising generation:

1. Assume They Share None of Your Christian Presuppositions

It used to be you could pretty much count on most people holding some residual, back-of-the-mind biblical presuppositions. That was good because it gave you something to work with. They might not believe in Jesus, but at least they’d respect the Bible and generally believe God created the world. With nones, however, you can’t really assume those presuppositions anymore.

In conversation after conversation, I have to burn through layer after layer of my own assumptions since the person I’m talking to simply doesn’t share them. I can’t start with Jesus because they don’t think he existed; I can’t start with God because they don’t think he exists, either; nor with the Bible because they don’t even think it’s trustworthy at the most basic level.

Time and again, I go all the way back to the beginning and build up a rationale for my faith from ground zero—defending it against skepticism and questions every step of the way. In some ways, that’s actually a good thing. It’s forced me over time to know precisely what I believe and why I believe it, and now—hundreds of conversations into this thing—I know the superstructure of my faith backward and forward. A Christianity that begins and ends with, “Well, you just have to have faith,” simply doesn’t cut it with a generation that shares none of your presuppositions. You have to bring them, step by step, to a confidence that the Bible really is trustworthy, that Jesus really is reliable, and finally that the gospel is true.

2. Frame the Gospel of Jesus in Its Epic Biblical Storyline

Don’t just give people four spiritual laws or three important truths. Help them realize Jesus is the culmination of a vast and sparkling epic God has been working out in the world since the beginning. If millennials think Christianity is just about three or four sentences that can fit on a napkin, it’s going to seem shallow and flimsy compared to the myriad other philosophies and religions competing for their attention. Teach them about kingdom and priesthood, fall and death, sacrifice and atonement. Show them how King Jesus the Resurrected identifies with his ruined people, takes up the sword from the hand of King Adam the Fallen, succeeds where he failed, and exhausts the curse God the Creator had pronounced over him.

Christianity rests on a spell-binding story about the history and future of the world—a story of kings and conquests and failures and redemptions that, when once you understand it, makes Jesus breathtakingly awesome. Tell them that story in all its glory.

3. Be Confident About Your Faith in Jesus

To have faith in Jesus doesn’t mean you believe in him even though you don’t have any good reasons. It means you’ve sized him up, you’ve come to the conclusion he is who he says he is, so you rely on him and ultimately bow your knee to him as king. Faith isn’t flimsy; by its very definition, it’s immovably confident. I’ve learned over the years that having that kind of confidence in the truth of Christianity is crucial and surprising in conversations with millennials. For whatever reasons, skeptics will always begin a conversation assuming I’m going to be on the defensive. 

Therefore, I go on the offensive. Instead of just trying to show why it’s okay for me to believe the Bible, I press my conversation partner to prove why it’s okay for them not to believe in it. Instead of being satisfied with proving it’s reasonable for me to believe in the resurrection of Jesus, I try to convince them it’s unreasonable for them not to believe in it. Just that bit of attitudinal change—from worldview defense to gospel offense—is usually enough to change the whole tenor of the conversation. It communicates to the young skeptic maybe he doesn’t in fact have the holy hand grenade that has the power to take down the whole superstructure of Christianity in a single blow: “Listen, friend, we Christians have been thinking about these things for about 2,000 years now. So I promise, you’re not going to take it all down with your freshman response paper on the problem of evil.”

4. Keep Your Eye on the Tomb

Christianity rises or falls on the resurrection, full stop. If Jesus really did get up from the dead, then something extraordinary has happened, and we had all better listen to him because everything he ever claimed about himself—that he’s the Son of God, the King of Kings, the Suffering Servant, the Lamb of God—has been vindicated. On the other hand, if that didn’t happen, well then never mind on all of it. Not only does it all not matter, but everything we believe as Christians and stake our lives on is false. As Paul put it, we are of all people the most pitiful. That’s why it’s so important, in conversations with millennials and any other unbeliever for that matter, to keep your eye on the tomb. Don’t get sidetracked into long conversations about this or that peripheral issue.

The question is, “Did Jesus rise from the dead?” Answer that, and then we can talk about other things.

One characteristic of this generation of nones is they seem to be very much aware of certain things about Christian ethics and doctrine they simply don’t like. “I don’t like how Christians are anti-science,” they say, “or anti-evolution, or anti-gay, or whatever. I don’t like complementarianism, and I don’t like Christian sexuality, and I believe in a woman’s right to choose, and I don’t like the doctrine of hell, and you’re intolerant, too!” Essentially it amounts to a smokescreen of objections and negative impressions. And in the face of that, there’s a great temptation to take each of those objections on, one by one, usually in the spirit of removing obstacles to faith. Don’t take that bait. Instead, talk for just a bit about one or two of those issues and questions; show your friend you really are thoughtful about them. But then, as quickly as you can, head to the center: “Look, we can continue talking about these things, friend; I’m happy to do that, and I hope you can see I’m not being unreasonable about them. But you need to understand you’re really just picking around the edges of Christianity with these things. If you really want to get at the center of it, if you really want to understand it—or make me doubt it, for that matter—we’re going to have to talk about whether Jesus rose from the dead. Because what you decide about that question affects all the others; in fact, it pretty much decides all the others. So let’s aim for the root: Did Jesus rise from the dead or not?”

Yesterday, Today, Forever

In the end, there’s no magic formula for convincing millennials and nones to embrace Jesus. There’s no special key that will unlock their hearts. And that makes sense, because there’s never been a magic formula or special key for any generation of humans.

What’s needed is the same thing that’s been needed in every generation—a smart, confident, resurrection-grounded explanation of the astonishingly wonderful thing God has done in Christ, who is the same yesterday, today, and forever.

Editors’ note: This article originally appeared in the October 2015 issue of Southern Seminary’s Towers.

Greg Gilbert is the senior pastor of Third Avenue Baptist Church in Louisville, Kentucky. He is the author of What Is the Gospel? (Crossway, 2010) and co-author of What Is the Mission of the Church?: Making Sense of Social Justice, Shalom, and the Great Commission (Crossway, 2011), Preach: Theology Meets Practice (Crossway, 2012), and The Gospel at Work: How Working for King Jesus Gives Purpose and Meaning to Our Jobs (Zondervan, 2014).

Continue reading at The Gospel Coalition | Latest Articles http://ift.tt/1Oyura2
Thanks for visiting. Please check out my other Apologetics-related posts. Follow me on Twitter @xianreasons, and on Face book at Christian Reasons. Have a blessed day! simul iustus et peccator, Eric Adams

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J This is what I’m currently reading: Even as an atheist, I understood the challenge offered by the “Standard Cosmological Model” (the Big Bang Theory) when examined from my naturalistic worldview. This model infers a “cosmological singularity” in which all space, time and matter came into existence at a point in the distant past. In others words, “everything” came from “nothing”. I …

Continue reading at Cold Case Christianity http://ift.tt/1Jj4idC
Thanks for visiting. Please check out my other Apologetics-related posts. Follow me on Twitter @xianreasons, and on Face book at Christian Reasons. Have a blessed day! simul iustus et peccator, Eric Adams

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J This is what I’m currently reading:

Whenever something terrible happens on the news, like t […]

The post Evil Proves the Existence of God appeared first on Christian Worldview.

Continue reading at Christian Worldview http://ift.tt/1HXCvLA
Thanks for visiting. Please check out my other Apologetics-related posts. Follow me on Twitter @xianreasons, and on Face book at Christian Reasons. Have a blessed day! simul iustus et peccator, Eric Adams

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J This is what I’m currently reading:

Here’s what I am convinced of: for as long as Christians can believe what they want without persecution (i.e. imprisonment or death), they will continue to think it is okay to ignore the political situation around them. Because it doesn’t harm them. As soon as that line is crossed, they won’t be able to ignore […]

Continue reading at Christian Worldview Discipleship http://ift.tt/1fpz8p0
Thanks for visiting. Please check out my other Apologetics-related posts. Follow me on Twitter @xianreasons, and on Face book at Christian Reasons. Have a blessed day! simul iustus et peccator, Eric Adams

http://ift.tt/1IChuJ0 This is what I’m currently reading:

Continue reading at LifeNews.com http://ift.tt/1eciTKR
Thanks for visiting. Please check out my other Apologetics-related posts. Follow me on Twitter @xianreasons, and on Face book at Christian Reasons. Have a blessed day! simul iustus et peccator, Eric Adams

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J This is what I’m currently reading: Our country was founded to be a religiously free country. This was one of the primary goals, if not the primary goal, of the pilgrims in coming over from England. Later on, even the founding fathers who were not Christian still believed in religious freedom. For instance, Thomas Jefferson, hardly a Christian himself, did not […]

Continue reading at Green Baggins http://ift.tt/1JMoVgA
Thanks for visiting. Please check out my other Apologetics-related posts. Follow me on Twitter @xianreasons, and on Face book at Christian Reasons. Have a blessed day! simul iustus et peccator, Eric Adams

http://ift.tt/1NCGHEs This is what I’m currently reading:

Continue reading at Sultan Knish: No Truce With the Left http://ift.tt/1Uh04HL
Thanks for visiting. Please check out my other Apologetics-related posts. Follow me on Twitter @xianreasons, and on Face book at Christian Reasons. Have a blessed day! simul iustus et peccator, Eric Adams

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J This is what I’m currently reading: (CNS News) Middle and high school students can’t get a Coca-Cola or a candy bar at 13 Seattle public schools, but they can get a taxpayer-funded intrauterine device (IUD) implanted without their parents’ consent.
School-based health clinics in at least 13 Seattle-area public high schools and middle schools offer long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including IUDs and […]

Continue reading at WND http://ift.tt/1NBjPVN
Thanks for visiting. Please check out my other Apologetics-related posts. Follow me on Twitter @xianreasons, and on Face book at Christian Reasons. Have a blessed day! simul iustus et peccator, Eric Adams

http://ift.tt/1NAF4GO This is what I’m currently reading:

Continue reading at Stand Firm http://ift.tt/1IxnXpK
Thanks for visiting. Please check out my other Apologetics-related posts. Follow me on Twitter @xianreasons, and on Face book at Christian Reasons. Have a blessed day! simul iustus et peccator, Eric Adams

http://ift.tt/1FTVCbB This is what I’m currently reading:

One of the most fundamental questions human beings have asked "Where did we come from?" The Christian will respond that we are creations of God. Modern atheism, though, seeks to erase God from the picture by proposing that we came about as a result of a very lucky combination of material and the laws of science where short strands of polynucleotides—the stuff that makes up our DNA and RNA molecules—would stick together to form longer chains. The story goes that eventually, an RNA molecule would form that could self-replicate and life would begin.

Just how much luck was involved? Dr. David Berlinski discusses it here:

Was nature lucky? It depends on the payoff and the odds. The payoff is clear: an ancestral form of RNA capable of replication. Without that payoff, there is no life, and obviously, at some point, the payoff paid well. The question is the odds.

For the moment, no one knows precisely how to compute those odds, if only because within the laboratory, no one has conducted an experiment leading to a self-replicating ribozyme. But the minimum length or "sequence" that is needed for a contemporary ribozyme to undertake what the distinguished geochemist Gustaf Arrhenius calls "demonstrated ligase activity" is known. It is roughly 100 nucleotides.

Whereupon, just as one might expect, things blow up very quickly. As Arrhenius notes, there are 4100, or roughly 1060 nucleotide sequences that are 100 nucleotides in length. This is an unfathomably large number. It exceeds the number of atoms in the universe, as well as the age of the universe in seconds. If the odds in favor of self-replication are 1 in 1060, no betting man would take them, no matter how attractive the payoff, and neither presumably would nature.1

Following that description, Berlinski notes that Arrhenius seeks to escape his own dilemma by proposing that such long self-replicating sequences may not have been as rare in the primeval earth as they are today. He then answers:

Why should self-replicating RNA molecules have been common 3.6 billion years ago when they are impossible to discern under laboratory conditions today? No one, for that matter, has ever seen a ribozyme capable of any form of catalytic action that is not very specific in its sequence and thus unlike even closely related sequences. No one has ever seen a ribozyme able to undertake chemical action without a suite of enzymes in attendance. No one has ever seen anything like it.

The odds, then, are daunting; and when considered realistically, they are even worse than this already alarming account might suggest. The discovery of a single molecule with the power to initiate replication would hardly be sufficient to establish replication. What template would it replicate against? We need, in other words, at least two, causing the odds of their joint discovery to increase from 1 in 1060 to 1 in 10120. Those two sequences would have been needed in roughly the same place. And at the same time. And organized in such a way as to favor base pairing. And somehow held in place. And buffered against competing reactions. And productive enough so that their duplicates would not at once vanish in the soundless sea.

In contemplating the discovery by chance of two RNA sequences a mere forty nucleotides in length, Joyce and Orgel concluded that the requisite "library" would require 1048 possible sequences. Given the weight of RNA, they observed gloomily, the relevant sample space would exceed the mass of the Earth. And this is the same Leslie Orgel, it will be remembered, who observed that "it was almost certain that there once was an RNA world." 2

This section of Berlinski’s article deals with just one step of a multi-step process that would fashion the first life. Other pieces include the advancement from self-replicating RNA to a fully working cell producing the appropriate amino acids and nucleic acids to function as well as assembling the right nucleic acids to construct the polynucleotides to begin with. And we haven’t even factored in the problem of chirality.  However, looking at Berlinski’s numbers alone, it seems clear that a reasonable person would not assume life came about by dumb luck.

References

1. Berlinski, David. "On the Origin of Life." The Nature of Nature: Examining the Role of Naturalism in Science. By Bruce L. Gordon and William A. Dembski. Wilmington: ISI, 2011. 286. Print.
2. Berlinski, 2011. 286-287.
Image courtesy Toni Lozano [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Continue reading at Come Reason’s Apologetics Notes http://ift.tt/1HXpDcM
Thanks for visiting. Please check out my other Apologetics-related posts. Follow me on Twitter @xianreasons, and on Face book at Christian Reasons. Have a blessed day! simul iustus et peccator, Eric Adams